Sunday, February 12, 2006
RCon and Separatism of Thoughts
Most enjoyable article about the Identity of Humans in a Co-Operative Hierarchy of the Internet, where the author, Rebecca, insures the readers of their worst fears; cyber-utopians and Microsoft led conferences discussing Identity on the Internet.
Well, it does stretch forward to point out those two facts, but it also reaches left and right to gather resources and material for you readers to plainly gain insight and to refurbish your internet terminology and phobia at the same time. In the receptive balancing act of displaying both the cons, arch-cons, and developing cons of the conference, she urges the readers with technical abilities in programming, online script, and internet savvy vocabulary to contribute to this dialogue; eventually, her reasoning being, that with a technologically advanced opposition, there may be a plausible response to this increasingly disarrayed and Big Brother-type censorship and stalking of the internet users.
My take on this is that the public have no idea this is going on; except for the few thousands who read her blog (and although my mission is not to make-believe that if the public knew there would be a better future for the internet) there is a consensus that the more the better.
Just as the corporate world takes advantage of the numbers to reel in their Greens (I am not going into those finer points), the writers of the world should take it upon them to introduce this topic (though heavy on technical jargon such as metasystems) in Laymen terms and to give their opinions or graft their solutions and offer them to the Identity Gang or to any group they would rather toss their salad of ideas with.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I may need to separate my Archives- but don't know how?
0.0 Hmmmm.
Well, it does stretch forward to point out those two facts, but it also reaches left and right to gather resources and material for you readers to plainly gain insight and to refurbish your internet terminology and phobia at the same time. In the receptive balancing act of displaying both the cons, arch-cons, and developing cons of the conference, she urges the readers with technical abilities in programming, online script, and internet savvy vocabulary to contribute to this dialogue; eventually, her reasoning being, that with a technologically advanced opposition, there may be a plausible response to this increasingly disarrayed and Big Brother-type censorship and stalking of the internet users.
My take on this is that the public have no idea this is going on; except for the few thousands who read her blog (and although my mission is not to make-believe that if the public knew there would be a better future for the internet) there is a consensus that the more the better.
Just as the corporate world takes advantage of the numbers to reel in their Greens (I am not going into those finer points), the writers of the world should take it upon them to introduce this topic (though heavy on technical jargon such as metasystems) in Laymen terms and to give their opinions or graft their solutions and offer them to the Identity Gang or to any group they would rather toss their salad of ideas with.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I may need to separate my Archives- but don't know how?
0.0 Hmmmm.
