Sunday, February 19, 2006
Drifting From the Point
Note to self: Wars of Occupation -unbeknowest to thousand year old conventional wisdom- involve the destruction of infrastructure (no kidding?), human deaths (gasp!), and facillitate the rise of fundamentalism (facillitate the rise of fundamentalism...Of course). However, peaceful tree-huggers (the metaphor is only too attractive here) intend to change all this. The rules in Wars of Occupation will change; From this colorful day onward, when a people are distinctly and obtusely threatened by a web of poetic enemies and they have differences that really do amount to life and death situations, they will merely shrug their shoulders and return to their television sets to watch reruns of "I Love Lucy".
***
There is a sense of communal and neutral sorrow that such a "society with a long history of secularism and women's achievements" has been castrated and thrown to the dogs of fundamentalism.
We are not blaming N, we are not referring to the obvious "typos" in her comment, we are only spreading our seed in such a non-conformist manner as to make us individuals who believe in N-othing but nothing finally return to complete nothingness. We await the Great Mahd-Hatter's return, and hope that someone else will clean up after us.
Another Note To Self:
Who exactly is the enemy. Where does this Enemy work, in what periphery of influence? Where is this Enemy from, and for what does it choose to be the Enemy? These are questions that Nikki will never be able to answer. How do I know this? Because, if you look closely, she just hasn't. Not only has she not been able to answer this, but she would never be able to prove her answer. Who really is your Enemy? Do any of us have conclusive evidence that would bind the term Enemy to a certain geographical location(s), or to a certain party or parties. No. There is only the occasional outward thrust of deviousness that occasionally spooks our brains, from wars to warriors, society to hermetics, that believes in a symbol that really does not exist as an entity by itself but as a whole, and the deviousness retracts from the outer periphery of ideologue and snaps back into the deep reverie of the mind because the answer is simply "No" or "Don't Know".
Then, there's the question of When. When are we really talking about oppression? This is nothing new that civlizations have not done for thousands of years. Oppression is a cycle of life. It is the overpowering forces of Nature that take hold of all things natural in our world. The only unnatural part of our world, it seems, is the uncannily unnatural human mind.
The problem here is almost simple, almost the core of all problems, almost; numbers. We are constricted by them, and we are ruled by them. Everything we live by are numbered or have numbers, and that includes resources. Humans need more numbers than other humans to survive; these numbers can be land, food, and or material wealth, which goes full circle. All of these ideas combined are the limbs of a central theme for resources and wealth in resources. The ideas that flow come from the luxuries of such resources or a by-product of the influence of these resources.
---
"In a minute there is time
For decisions and Revisions which in a minute will reverse"
***
There is a sense of communal and neutral sorrow that such a "society with a long history of secularism and women's achievements" has been castrated and thrown to the dogs of fundamentalism.
"As for you being an activist for women in your real life, well, you don't have to prove anything to me. And I respect your right to anonymous. It just freaks me out that people like you who support wars of occupation that destroy infrastructures, kill civilians, and facilitate the rise of fundamentalism in a society with a long history of secularism and women's achievements is out there working for "women's rights". "
-The Letter N.
We are not blaming N, we are not referring to the obvious "typos" in her comment, we are only spreading our seed in such a non-conformist manner as to make us individuals who believe in N-othing but nothing finally return to complete nothingness. We await the Great Mahd-Hatter's return, and hope that someone else will clean up after us.
Another Note To Self:
Who exactly is the enemy. Where does this Enemy work, in what periphery of influence? Where is this Enemy from, and for what does it choose to be the Enemy? These are questions that Nikki will never be able to answer. How do I know this? Because, if you look closely, she just hasn't. Not only has she not been able to answer this, but she would never be able to prove her answer. Who really is your Enemy? Do any of us have conclusive evidence that would bind the term Enemy to a certain geographical location(s), or to a certain party or parties. No. There is only the occasional outward thrust of deviousness that occasionally spooks our brains, from wars to warriors, society to hermetics, that believes in a symbol that really does not exist as an entity by itself but as a whole, and the deviousness retracts from the outer periphery of ideologue and snaps back into the deep reverie of the mind because the answer is simply "No" or "Don't Know".
Then, there's the question of When. When are we really talking about oppression? This is nothing new that civlizations have not done for thousands of years. Oppression is a cycle of life. It is the overpowering forces of Nature that take hold of all things natural in our world. The only unnatural part of our world, it seems, is the uncannily unnatural human mind.
The problem here is almost simple, almost the core of all problems, almost; numbers. We are constricted by them, and we are ruled by them. Everything we live by are numbered or have numbers, and that includes resources. Humans need more numbers than other humans to survive; these numbers can be land, food, and or material wealth, which goes full circle. All of these ideas combined are the limbs of a central theme for resources and wealth in resources. The ideas that flow come from the luxuries of such resources or a by-product of the influence of these resources.
---
"In a minute there is time
For decisions and Revisions which in a minute will reverse"
